Dt: 25 Dec 2015
Today lets talk about Free Basics ,a topic which has been garnering quite a bit of protest n publicity on the internet . An issue which is not very clearly touched upon or understood. With this article I aim to share my understanding & doubts about the concept .I might be wrong & would love to be corrected on this one
So in essence Free Basics as I understand will give you the ability to access a certain few websites through your internet provider free of cost.Another version that I read today is that the favored websites would load faster than the other websites on the Free Basics platform.
Argument in Favour : Free internet access to a selected bouquet of websites at minimum price OR free of cost will ensure that internet reaches to those poor who currently cannot afford it .
Argument Against: By allowing access to only few websites the purity of internet is being compromised.This will ensure that the internet will not be a level playing field for all especially for new websites beginning on their journey.
I will provide my argument in favor of Free basics as I have been drawn by this concept when I first heard about it.Some might suggest that Indians just like anything that is free & therefore do not bother to look into the details .But I feel this concept is a good one and is needed in a country like ours.
But to win an argument like this I would like to start with counter arguments.
I use two analogies to argue my case
First Analogy-- The Satellite TV space in India.
When the TV was a thing in the late 80s we just had two channels Doordarshan & DD Metro .Every household used to watch the same channels till we entered the age of Satellite TV. Suddenly we were exposed to a range of TV channels some national some international.But the poor & even the middle class were deprived of access to this kind of entertainment. We watched what came free to us coz we could not afford the dish antenna or a connection from the local cable TV operator.I do not remember anyone arguing at that time that all TV channels should be made available to all at the same price.The analogy is better supported today where on the Set top Boxes you have two options
Can we then argue that channels reaching our television using the free to air route are the ones which have an unfair advantage.?
Are some rich pockets/entertainment companies using the free to air route to push their new channels to a wider audience .
Compare that to a new entertainment channel which has to face hardships during its initial years .
Lets do a random check & you will know that the entertainment industry is restricted to a select few business houses & unless you dont have the capital you cannot break through?
Is that MONOPOLY ?Why does no one talk about equality ..neutrality?
Was the air space meant to be auctioned? Was internet ONLY supposed to be pure /free/not controlled by business
Second Analogy-- The Real Estate Industry
Learn from the real estate industry as to how money can change the way you do business.
Lets say that we have a reasonably remote area which is not well connected and we have two developers who have constructed new apartments from buying plot at almost the same price.
So far so fair..Both incur same construction costs and say build around 100 apartments each.
But apartments in the established developers society get sold at a premium but the other developer has still not been able to sell his apartments.Where did he miss the trick?
Following was the major difference between the two
Today lets talk about Free Basics ,a topic which has been garnering quite a bit of protest n publicity on the internet . An issue which is not very clearly touched upon or understood. With this article I aim to share my understanding & doubts about the concept .I might be wrong & would love to be corrected on this one
So in essence Free Basics as I understand will give you the ability to access a certain few websites through your internet provider free of cost.Another version that I read today is that the favored websites would load faster than the other websites on the Free Basics platform.
Argument in Favour : Free internet access to a selected bouquet of websites at minimum price OR free of cost will ensure that internet reaches to those poor who currently cannot afford it .
Argument Against: By allowing access to only few websites the purity of internet is being compromised.This will ensure that the internet will not be a level playing field for all especially for new websites beginning on their journey.
I will provide my argument in favor of Free basics as I have been drawn by this concept when I first heard about it.Some might suggest that Indians just like anything that is free & therefore do not bother to look into the details .But I feel this concept is a good one and is needed in a country like ours.
But to win an argument like this I would like to start with counter arguments.
I use two analogies to argue my case
First Analogy-- The Satellite TV space in India.
When the TV was a thing in the late 80s we just had two channels Doordarshan & DD Metro .Every household used to watch the same channels till we entered the age of Satellite TV. Suddenly we were exposed to a range of TV channels some national some international.But the poor & even the middle class were deprived of access to this kind of entertainment. We watched what came free to us coz we could not afford the dish antenna or a connection from the local cable TV operator.I do not remember anyone arguing at that time that all TV channels should be made available to all at the same price.The analogy is better supported today where on the Set top Boxes you have two options
- Free to Air Channels (I would like to compare this to Free Basics)
- Paid Channels (This would be more like the whole of internet.Pay a price & get access to all)
Can we then argue that channels reaching our television using the free to air route are the ones which have an unfair advantage.?
Are some rich pockets/entertainment companies using the free to air route to push their new channels to a wider audience .
Compare that to a new entertainment channel which has to face hardships during its initial years .
Lets do a random check & you will know that the entertainment industry is restricted to a select few business houses & unless you dont have the capital you cannot break through?
Is that MONOPOLY ?Why does no one talk about equality ..neutrality?
Was the air space meant to be auctioned? Was internet ONLY supposed to be pure /free/not controlled by business
Second Analogy-- The Real Estate Industry
Learn from the real estate industry as to how money can change the way you do business.
Lets say that we have a reasonably remote area which is not well connected and we have two developers who have constructed new apartments from buying plot at almost the same price.
So far so fair..Both incur same construction costs and say build around 100 apartments each.
But apartments in the established developers society get sold at a premium but the other developer has still not been able to sell his apartments.Where did he miss the trick?
Following was the major difference between the two
- Premium developer provides pick & drop shuttles from the nearest railway station/bus station (free basics)
- New developer can only sell his flats to people with cars (no access to free basics)
Why didnt anyone argued for new developers who would like to make an entry to the real estate market.Why give unfair advantage to the established developers..
I can go on & on with numerous analogies and this would never end.....
So I am amused at our friends who are under the impression that the internet is a 'FREE n FAIR' entity & is not driven by businessmen & rich pockets.Its a myth & we need to get out of this .The sooner the better.There might be concerns but those are businessmen who are raising these concerns.This has nothing to do with the poor enduser.
I feel that with Free basics we give the opportunity to our poor to access the internet.We give access to the internet for our kids studying in schools & colleges in our villages .What if its just the basics.What if its just a few websites.What if its just enabling better communication in the rural areas.This is a revolution & we must support it . When I am on the internet there is so much material that it would need at least a few lives to consume all.So what is the fear if not everyone has access to all content.
People who are fiercely driving the net neutrality bandwagon are the ones who have vested business interests as well.I am not saying that Facebook just got philanthropic .No even they mean business as evident by the full page ads in today's newspaper.But yes we need to choose whats right for our people.As long as they are not anti national .As long as the content is not restricted & propaganda driven.Blocking something on the context that is not fair is absolute bull ****.
Tell me what is fair in this world.Tell me if everyone is treated as equal in this world?If you are so concerned about neutrality & equality apply it to all spheres of life.Not just the internet.
For starters can you ensure that all get access to the basics food,clothing & shelter in this country & then we shall talk about NET NEUTRALITY.
I want to conclude by quoting this genius who has posted an article in 'The Logical Indian' (I think we must have such domain names taken away from these ...forget it).So here goes the quote
"Given that data packages cost as little as Rs. 20 a month "
I want to salute this great man & if he is serious someday he might make a real good finance minister :-).Jokes apart.This comment is epic in the sense that it even beats Raj Babbar's "full meal in Rs.12 in Mumbai "
I am convinced that Free Basics is a must in India, all developing/under developed economies of the world & it will take some very sharp minds to make me change my opinion on this one .But I definitely wont be taking advice from the Startup INVESTOR who writes for 'The Logical Indian' :p.